Tags: ,

OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1

OPPT Courtesy Notice - A point by point review - Part 1The following article was republished here with the express written permission of the author.


The OPPT promotes the use of a Courtesy Notice (CN) amongst its followers. The stated purpose of the CN is “To politely and powerfully notify all alleged “corporate agents “who seek to interact with us, of the foreclosure of the world’s corporations, including all “banks” and corporate “governments” and the subsequent capacity in which recipients act upon receipt of this notice, namely as individuals with full liability for their actions”.

For those considering the use of the CN and are looking for a second opinion we have conducted an unbiased, unemotional and objective analysis of the CN in several parts. All the information presented is transparent and you are free to check the legal definitions yourself. The article is presented for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please always seek your own legal advice in regards legal documents that you are considering signing.

Further, this review should not be construed as an attack on the document. It is simply an unbiased and unemotional analysis of the material to enable you to make up your own mind.

The first and foremost thing to understand about the CN is that it is a legal document that defines rights, duties, entitlements and liabilities, no differently to any other contract, will, deed, promissory note or share certificate. This should be no secret as OPPT also tell you this in their Courtesy Notice guideline document.

Now let’s look at the details point by point. Any text in bold and italics is from the Courtesy Notice while normal text is my commentary:

Page 1


The personal details of the Respondent and the Proponent are in separate boxes. A name inserted within a box is specific to corporate identities. Respondent means the party against whom an appeal is taken, in other words the person that is being sent the CN. The Proponent, which is you, the person sending in the CN, means a person who puts forward the contract for consideration or acceptance.

In other words, if you are offering this document to another person, you are offering to enter into a legal contract with that person. The respondent is accepting it as an appeal, which means that you are prepared for this matter to go to a higher authority and have the matter dealt with in a court of law.

Unlimited personal liability arising from foreclosure of all banks, all corporate governments and all other corporations by UCC filings of the One People’s Public Trust. (OPPT)

This statement places personal accountability on you for any action that may occur because of the termination of another entity’s rights to property by the OPPT. In other words you are personally liable if the wronged entity decides to seek satisfaction, which could include going after your own personal assets. These entity’s include banks, corporate governments AND corporations.

This statement clearly establishes that by signing this CN and using it, not only has the power of another entity over yourself and your assets been removed, but you have accepted that your personal corporate powers including any legitimate contract you hold, have been removed and you are now under the control of the OPPT.


This makes the statement that you are legally, and through a witness to your signature, agreeing to this document and everything that may occur to you because of that agreement.

I am the sole lawful and legal REGISTERED owner, custodian, and trustee of my BE’ing, any and all creations therefrom and property thereof…

This paragraph states that you are making your oath of ownership to contract to the OPPT. ‘REGISTERED’ means entered in a public registry, enrolled formally, recorded, filed. ‘BE’ing’, in all caps is the dictionary definition of Bills of Exchange. The ‘ing’ turns it into a doing word. ‘Creations’ refers to the act of making something that has not been made before, the making of a new life.

In other words, in this oath you are establishing everything you are giving into the contract, past, present and future. This includes the following:

  • Your de jure rights – your nationality, which includes your standing and your inherent rights as a claim to God;
  • Your de facto rights as provided by government;
  • Any item you have registered under your legal title;
  • Anything you own;
  • Anything you hold custody of – specifically your children;
  • Anything you are trustee for – your will and assets on behalf of your children, your one share and one vote in your constitutional structure of government;
  • Your ‘self’ as an asset of value – collateral;
  • Creations that emanate from your body and mind, including children, your DNA and your thoughts;
  • Your property of any kind and form that exist because of your body and mind; and
  • Property you now hold and any property you may hold in the future.

…UCC Doc. File No’s 2012127810, 2012127854, 2012127907, 1012127914 restated and incorporated here by reference as if set forth in full, original notice of DECLARATION OF FACTS by public registration made and given by the One People’s Public Trust, hereafter “OPPT”.

Why does it say these filings are ‘restated’? My legal dictionary indicates that a Restatement is a specific form of formatted documentation that is not binding on a court unless it has been officially adopted as the law by that jurisdiction’s highest court.

The UCC documents are established as the documents of a corporation – that being the OPPT – in this CN through the reference to the DECLARATION OF FACTS. So anyone planning to use the CN would be very wise to have read and absorbed ALL the details of that DECLARATION – and any and all other documents that relate or are involved in it, prior to using the CN in any way.

The CN effectively creates a contract between you and the OPPT corporation.

I have and do knowingly, willingly, intentionally adopt, reconfirm and ratify said DECLARATION OF FACTS as my own duly verified due DECLARATION OF FACTS, nunc pro tunc praeterea preterea, unrebutted as a matter of law, as a matter of fact, and as a matter of public policy, hereafter “Proponent”.

This is a clear oath of acceptance, freely and willingly entered into, with full knowledge of the outcome, giving formal approval.

It is interesting to note the use of the word ‘ratify’. That is a legal term specific to Treaties. It indicates that one sovereign is agreeing to a contract with another sovereign. In international law the final establishment of consent by the parties to a treaty to be bound by it usually include the exchange or deposit of instruments of ratification.

The Treaty being enacted is the DECLARATION OF FACTS, which is unknown in its implications (still to be analyzed). However, you are now claiming it for your own use and have verified that with a witness, making it an enforceable legal instrument over you.

Nunc pro tunc praeterea preterea“, loosely translated means “Now for then, thereafter, further“. In other words you are binding yourself to the DECLARATION through treaty, for the past, the present and the future. Now read this closely:

  • That means you are agreeing that this treaty can never be undone. You and your children are bound forever;
  • You are accepting that the filings have not been rebutted in any court of law, under any facts or as a matter relevant to the whole of society; and
  • From now on you have legally adopted the role of the Proponent.

The conclusion is that this document is a treaty between yourself as a sovereign, corporate, legal and equitable person and an organization of undisclosed political & international ramifications, wherein you give yourself and your personal property and rights (both past, present and future), as outlined above, to that organization for ever. Think about the implications of that.

To be continued in Part 2.

Author: John Charles, Oppt Truth


The article above was also posted at the links below:




By Paul Short on 20/04/2013

Share "OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1" with your friends!

Share this on Twitter Link to this on Facebook Stumble this Submit this to Reddit Bookmark this on Delicious

Related Posts

5 Responses to “OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1”

  1. [...] OPPT Courtesy Notice – A point by point review – Part 1 [...]

  2. Cindy says:

    So pauly. Has the gov been foreclosed or not??

  3. BeWise says:

    Hello Paul,

    The courtesy notice was never done by OPPT but by a man from Australia who came to find out that the common wealth of the Australian government was posing as a corporation. His name is Scott Bartle who did a short documentary before OPPT was ever announced. In the documentary called “frequently unanswered questions about the Australian government” he talks about his experience trying to import a car from the U.S. to Australia. He talks about the difficulties of what he encountered and how he resolved the problem. The link to the documentary can be found here http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=umVj5XQYAi8.

    The courtesy notice was a tool he used to communicate with the corporation known as the commonwealth of Australia. Do you see what these articles are doing Paul? They are exposing those who think OPPT is of the cabal yet they do no research and attack without knowing the facts. OPPT is not a corporation but an idea. An idea that all humans are equal and are eternal essence embodied, meaning we are all aspects of ALL THAT IS. That we are one in love and gratitude. Now what is wrong about an idea claiming transparency, truth, honesty, and accountability? All monetary systems are fraud because it converts the value of a human into a monetary value. This is the essence of OPPT that we humans are the value, whether it is gold, silver, fiat, or any other natural resource or currency.

    The global collateral accounts are backed by all humans living on this planet. Humans are the ones who mined the gold and other natural resources, it does not matter that this alleged value of gold ended up in Asia because it belongs to all of humanity. Any one who claims to be the sole owners wants to continue the hierarchy of the slavery system that currently exists. Heather herself has said that there is no need to use the courtesy notice because all corporations have been foreclosed, but if people wanted to act on their own behalf then they are welcomed to use this tool provided by Scott Bartle. They have even provided a disclaimer that those who use it do it at their own risk.

    It is articles like this which demonstrate a lack of understanding and thorough research because this article attacks OPPT by claiming false information. If you Paul did a little due diligence then they would know that Scott Bartle created the courtesy notice. And if you had done any more research then you would know that many people have had success using the courtesy notice. People have actually walked into banks and have spoken with bank managers and presidents of banks presenting them the courtesy notice and they know about the filings, yet things keep running because not many people know about the OPPT. It is still new info that has not caught any major traction yet. People have had debts discharged simply by using the courtesy notice.

    Now do not get me wrong, I am not defending OPPT but watching all sides as the info presents itself to me so I can use my own discernment. I do not believe or disbelieve but remain open to any info because it is too early to tell just want is occurring. This is a state eveyone who is a truth seeker should be. People just can’t read some blog or some obscure website and believe it as absolute truth. This is a very naive approach because I have met people who have far more knowledge and they have never been on the Internet.

    We need to remain open to ideas. So Paul, what is wrong with the idea of OPPT? There idea is to collapse the current corporate system and begin anew while Keenan promotes the existence of the current corporate system. You can not repair a system which is full of corruption, greed, and beyond repair. Putting a few bandaids on it with some global collateral accounts will basically continue the slavery system that exist.

    The great things humans can do is to be creative and build something new. If each human had the freedom and access to a healthy living then there is no limit to what we humans can accomplish. We have not had the opportunity to express our lives by living freely because we all have been slaves with out even realizing it. The great idea of OPPT which sets it apart from all other movements is that it promotes the ideas of equality, which is enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, and value being the human soul living in the here and now. Now what is wrong with that?

    I have said it before yet no one has answered my question, if OPPT is of the cabal then they just exposed themselves and the entire corporate system including the UCC. If OPPT is cabal then they just informed the world that their central banks run every government on this planet as a corporation. And that no de jure republics exist which would leave them pretty vulnerable because they just provided the human population with the solution to the worlds problems. That is the needed restoration of the de jure un centralized form of government which need to be reinstated by the people.

    How about that, they have exposed themselves and have provided the solution at the same time, yet you Paul attack them.

    I will keep watching all sides because the real truth is humanity is the real value. And once we all know this then we all will be truly free.

    Love and Unity to all,


    • Paul Short says:

      The article above clearly is talking about the courtesy notice from OPPT, not the one written by the guy from Australia.

      The article clearly shows the contract between OPPT and the user of the courtesy notice offered for download from the OPPT sites.

      The CN could have just as easily been worded in a way where the proponent declares themselves sovereign and free from all governance. Instead, it locks them into a perpetual contract with another corporate entity that literally owns them.

      Nice try at confusing people though.