Tags: nuclear event, radiation alert

I have been keeping an eye on this since the Fukushima nuclear reactor incident in Japan in 2011. The actions of the U.S. government, academia and mainstream media since that event are pointing to the distinct possibility that they are preparing for some type of nuclear or radiation event in the near future.

• Shortly after Fukushima happened, sensitive radiation detecting equipment on the West coast of North America started registering elevated levels of radiation, often orders of magnitude higher than the levels deemed safe for human beings. But instead of preparing ways for the public to protect themselves, Governments in both Canada and the U.S. simply turned off the equipment or adjusted the acceptable levels to be higher so the alarm bells wouldn’t continue to go off.
• In the mainstream news, the focus was on Fukushima, but they began to develop the narrative that radiation wasn’t such a bad thing, even going so far as to say it was good for you.
• Scientists and academic types like those from MIT and other prestigeous institutions started doing studies designed to prove that high doses of radiation weren’t so bad after all, and that long term exposure was the only way to really tell it’s effects on humans.
• Now, we find that the U.S. President has approved higher levels of radiation in drinking water as being safe for humans, which the article linked to shows could cause the rate of cancer increase dramatically in those affected.

And there is a lot more out there online to show that governments and media are marginalizing the seriousness of radiation exposure for humans.

But how can I assert that they’re preparing for some sort of future event? By looking at everything they do as a whole and how that whole is entered into the public record and public consciousness…

Turning off radiation measuring devices temporarily or making them less sensitive so they don’t go off can be seen as not wanting to panic the public. But have those meters been turned back on?

Academic studies and scientists saying that quick doses of radiation aren’t so bad can be looked at as keeping the public from panicking. But those studies are now permanently part of the body of science and entered into the public record.

Some media talking heads reading off a teleprompter and telling people that radiation ain’t so bad can be seen as keeping the public from panicking, but it’s also entering that into the public consciousness.

This led to governments being able to raise the acceptable limits of radiation in our environment because the experts and the public think it’s ok.

But the big deal is this – when a government gets involved, it doesn’t make laws, pass legislation or approve anything unless it plans on using it in the future.

And now that “radiation is ok” we’re going to be feeling it’s effects real soon. You can bet on it.

George Bush made the case for the invasion of Iraq by saying the next terrorist event could be in the form of a mushroom cloud.

The media has been saying for years that Iran has nuclear weapons and is a threat to the U.S.

Most recently, the propaganda mill has been shouting that North Korea has been rattling the nuclear sabre.

Terrorism in Boston. Huge explosion in Texas.

It’s coming, and I’m predicting it’ll happen on or within a day or two of May 1st.

Mayday.

I hope I’m wrong. If I am, you can all come back and make fun of me then.

By Paul Short on 21/04/2013

Related Posts

• No Related Posts Found