Reply
This is just a quick update to let people know that I’m still around. Things in the personal life aren’t going too well but I’ll get through it like I always have. For anyone who is concerned, I really appreciate it. Thanks.
In a recent ruling on protecting cell phone location data:
New York magistrate judge Gary Brown decided in favor of Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agents who were seeking his approval over a warrant on a doctor who they suspected was being paid for issuing thousands of prescriptions. The warrant would have compelled the physician’s phone company to provide real-time tracking data from his cell.
But this new ruling doesn’t just apply to corrupt doctors. Now that the following statement made by the magistrate has been made, it can be cited in just about any court case involving cell phones in the future.
I’ve been a member of a certain online forum for a few months now. The topic of the forum centers around truth, logic and exposing conspiracies as well as government and media corruption.
The owner, an ex NSA analyst, and core members there are very astute critical thinkers and they have cut through many of the lies rammed down the throats of the unwitting using sheer logic and common sense to investigate the legitimacy of the stories pushed out through the media. They have proven that the Fukushima nuclear reactors were sabotaged in March 2011, the 9.0 earthquake reported on that date didn’t happen, and most recently, that the explosions in Damascus, Syria were nuclear detonations rather than conventional explosives. So as you can imagine, the people and groups who want to keep these facts hidden under a veil of lies have been taking a lot of interest in the community.
This reminds me of the old Mafia ways of handling things, where speaking out about how much protection money you have to pay to the boys every month gets you a beating. Here’s a quote from the article linked here: KMOV’s Conners Barred From Facebook, Interviews on IRS Controversy
Conners wrote Monday night that shortly after he interviewed President Obama and his wife in April of 2012, the IRS “started hammering” him.
“At the time, I dismissed the ‘co-incidence’, but now, I have concerns … after revelations about the IRS targeting various groups and their members,” Conners wrote.
Conners issued a brief explanation of his post during the 6 p.m. news Tuesday night, stopping short of apologizing but explaining that his troubles with the IRS started years prior to his 2012 interview with President Obama.
I’ll make this quick and easy for you:
* The crime rate in Canada is lower than it’s been in almost 40 years, yet government spending on the justice system has risen so sharply that people want answers.
* Even though the rate of terrorism around the world, especially in the U.S., is up startlingly since 9/11, there has not yet been an act of terrorism in Canada since that day.
* Canada has long positive relations with Israel, even though that country brutalizes Palestinians, illegally occupies parts of several other countries and is threatening nuclear war with Iran, among numerous other violent acts in the Middle East and North Africa.
* On September 7, 2012, Canada closed its embassy in Iran and declared all remaining Iranian diplomats in Canada personae non gratae, ordering them to leave the country within five days.
* The FBI in the U.S. is well known for working under cover to approach young men, groom and train them to be terrorists, supply them with the materials like equipment and explosives and then arrest them at the last minute. Then the terrorism is reported in the mainstream news which makes the FBI look like heros at the same time as keeping the American public agitated and scared of terrorists. In fact, there have been 158 cases of such FBI terror plots compiled and published by journalists since 9/11.
* On April 22, exactly one week after the Boston Marathon Bombings and on the very same day Bill S-7, the Combatting Terrorism Act goes on the floor of the House of Commons for it’s third reading, the RCMP in Canada announced that with help from the FBI they had arrested two terrorist suspects who were allegedly planning to derail a VIA passenger train as it crossed the Whirlpool Rapids bridge while en route from Toronto to New York.
* Canadian investigators say Raed Jaser, and his suspected accomplice Chiheb Esseghaier, received “directions and guidance” from members of al-Qaida in Iran. Esseghaier is a PhD from Tunisia who was studying in Montreal and Jaser lived in Toronto and is reportedly a Palestinian from the United Arab Emirates.
So lets take a look at this. With the crime rate at it’s lowest point in almost 40 years and judicial spending rising, the cops in Canada need to justify their existence. There’s big money in heightened security and enforcement, and one way to get in on that cash is to jump on the heightened terror bandwagon. But with no terrorist acts going on in Canada, what better time to enact new terrorism laws than right after a widely publicized bombing a few hundred miles away, and justify it by arresting two suspected terrorists on the same day the bill goes for it’s final push through the House of Commons.
And the fact that one of the men is from Palestine and they were allegedly getting instructions from al-Qaeda in Iran, both countries villified by Israel, the icing is on the cake because it now sets the stage for Canadian involvement with it’s buddies in the Middle East in a war against Iran.
Who pays for these new completely unnecessary laws and new police powers? We do, in the form of new taxes as well as less civil liberties. We’re the hosts that the parasites will be living off of through enforcement of their new laws against us. The police seem to be doing a great job already. The crime rate is low and they caught the suspected terrorists without the help of any new laws. Why would they need more power?
Who gains the most from all this? They’re already doing things like this to us to keep their paychecks rolling in, and they want more power?
A couple of people have emailed me wondering why I haven’t written any posts on the Boston bombing. And the answer is simple: I didn’t want this blog to jump on the bandwagon. That’s all.
I have, however, been contributing to a couple of other sites that have been posting some amazing analysis of the now obvious farce of a story being put out by the police, intelligence agencies and mainstream news. It’s akin to a game of whack-a-mole where they present a lie, they’re caught red-handed, then they morph that lie into another, it gets debunked… It’s mind-blowing how incompetent these government and police agencies are.
I have been keeping an eye on this since the Fukushima nuclear reactor incident in Japan in 2011. The actions of the U.S. government, academia and mainstream media since that event are pointing to the distinct possibility that they are preparing for some type of nuclear or radiation event in the near future.
- Shortly after Fukushima happened, sensitive radiation detecting equipment on the West coast of North America started registering elevated levels of radiation, often orders of magnitude higher than the levels deemed safe for human beings. But instead of preparing ways for the public to protect themselves, Governments in both Canada and the U.S. simply turned off the equipment or adjusted the acceptable levels to be higher so the alarm bells wouldn’t continue to go off.
It makes total sense, doesn’t it? If you’re playing a game of hide and seek and it’s your turn to hide, do you tell the seeker where you are?
I see so many people online bragging about how they’re using whiz-bang software or stealthy techniques to conceal their online activities. They usually complain about having their computer hacked, or companies and govs spying on them, then they go on facebook or their favorite forum and outline in detail the security measures they’re taking.
Continue »
The following article was republished here with the express written permission of the author.
———————-
The OPPT promotes the use of a Courtesy Notice (CN) amongst its followers. The stated purpose of the CN is “To politely and powerfully notify all alleged “corporate agents “who seek to interact with us, of the foreclosure of the world’s corporations, including all “banks” and corporate “governments” and the subsequent capacity in which recipients act upon receipt of this notice, namely as individuals with full liability for their actions”.
For those considering the use of the CN and are looking for a second opinion we have conducted an unbiased, unemotional and objective analysis of the CN in several parts. All the information presented is transparent and you are free to check the legal definitions yourself. The article is presented for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Please always seek your own legal advice in regards legal documents that you are considering signing.
Further, this review should not be construed as an attack on the document. It is simply an unbiased and unemotional analysis of the material to enable you to make up your own mind.
Continue »
